Looking forward to getting my new sheaths and finally being able to carry my Game Warden (yes, those are mine in the picture :grin: )…

Game Warden Sheaths Game Warden Sheaths (back)

No Comments »June 3rd, 2009, 19:06 hours

Ultrafire C2

Rating: 4 / 5

Pros:
Inexpensive, sturdy, bright pencil beam, runs cool

Cons:
Limited close-range use due to narrow beam and high output, shiny housing, made in China, lacks the “quality feel” of Surefire and Fenix

The Bottom Line:
The price factored heavily into the rating, but it is still a nice light. All things considered I would buy it again. However the Fenix T1, despite it’s odd shape and size, is still the best bang for the buck in my collection.

In search of a cheap, yet powerful, LED light to mount on my (cheap) shotgun I stumbled upon the Ultrafire C2 at Deal Extreme. For a mere $18 (and another $6 for the remote pressure switch) I figured why not. Afterall, it is rated at 210 lumens and is getting great reviews (this is not the first time I had heard of Ultrafire).

The flashlight is quite light, much nicer to carry compared to the bulky Fenix T1, but I doubt it is nearly as strong as a Surefire. Still, it seems solidly built and does not rattle at all. The C2 is a very simple single-mode light, with a switch that is on par with most other tactical lights on the market. I did find the switch a little tougher to operate with my thumb as it is recessed into the body a little more than on other lights. The switch also lacks the ability to function momentarily by pressing it slightly, which I found rather disappointing. It will handle voltage inputs from 3.6 to 9 volts, and is designed to run on two CR123A lithium batteries or one 18650 battery. Batteries can be inserted from either end of the flashlight as both ends unscrew easily. The light lacks a pocket clip, but includes a lanyard. With a lens/reflector assembly this big, you probably wouldn’t want this light in your pocket or on your belt anyhow. The finish is strong, and yes, it is really that shiny. When running, the flashlight’s housing takes about three times as long to heat up as the Fenix and Surefire models tested, and it does not get nearly as hot. I am guessing this is due to the extra space between the LED and the housing.

The beam pattern leaves some to be desired as a multi-function light or a weapon light. While the distance of it’s throw is excellent, it is a true “pencil” pattern and is best suited to long range use. It would do well mounted to a mountain bike as a headlamp. The peripheral is not totally non-existant, but the brightness of the spot tends to take away from it. After having the four test lights out side by side I am tempted to carry the Ultrafire C2 in my truck and instead put the more flood-like Surefire L4 on the shotgun.

The Ultrafire C2The Ultrafire C2Tailcap SwitchCREE and Crinkle ReflectorLens/Reflector AssemblyLightUltrafire C2 Heat TestThe Test LightsBeam PatternsHead-On Blinding CapabilityBeam Patterns at 3 FeetBeam Patterns at 8 FeetEffective Light at 25 FeetEffective Light at 50 FeetEffective Light at 100 FeetShottylightTesting the Ultrafire C2Fire

Petzl Tactikka

Rating: 4.5 / 5

Pros:
Comfortable and light, long runtime, common AAA batteries, perfect general work/path lighting output

Cons:
Red filter is ineffective, producing a bright orange light with lots of white bleed; only one output level

The Bottom Line:
This is a great headlight, however for only $5 more the Tactikka Plus has an extra LED, strobe setting and 3 output levels.

It took forever to get this in from Botach (seriously, don’t order ANYTHING but closeout items from them if you need it this year), but they had the best price by a good 20% and were the only place I could find that carries the camo version (the other one is black with big ugly white logos): Petzl Tactikka @ Botach.

The light itself has been upgraded from the unit pictured on the site, and has the Tactikka Plus style ratchet adjustment for tilting the light to the preferred angle. Granted we didn’t come anywhere close to using them for the advertised 110-hour runtime, but they did not fade at all on a 5 hour night hike (actually, the return leg of a 10 hour hike). They are light enough to be comfortable despite running on 3 AAAs, and are adjustable from helmet-size all the way down to thigh size.

Their built-in red filter is kind of a joke, ending up with a bright orange and a lot of white bleed out the sides. It is handy for working on something up close I suppose, though the white light is not terribly overpowering. While I still grab for my Surefire to investigate sounds or search along the side of the trail, for hiking/climbing/running it is the perfect amount of illumination for the path to see where you are going and not white-out your night vision.

In action, tested between 30 and 50 feet (click the image for details):

Small and LightNot Too BrightAlmost HomePetzl TactikkaCold Tarantula

JetBoil Personal Cooking System

Rating: 4.75 / 5

Pros:
Simple, durable, compact and light-weight, easy to maintain, fast, boils enough water to make food for two, fold-up stabilizer base fits in the pot with burner and fuel for transit

Cons:
Dependence on canister fuels, a little top heavy when full (buy the fold-up base to fix this), just barely does not fit in pouches/pockets designed for a 1-liter Nalgene bottle, danger of burns from boiling water-volcano if you leave it running too long

The Bottom Line:
This is an excellent, efficient, light-weight stove that would compliment anyone’s backpacking rig well. It would also be useful in emergency kits or in the trunk of the car with a couple single-serving Mountain House dinners and a bottle of water.

Using the JetBoil is simple enough, I almost think it came with a manual just for the CYA warnings. The JetBoil really is a no brainer. Unfortunately, I was unable to find any JetBoil-branded mini canisters along the remote route we took for our last trip, so I had to settle for a full-size Coleman canister. I’ll have to take their word for the whole “2 cups in 2 minutes” thing, as I was distracted by something and came back at around 3 minutes to find my water violently boiling and the pot difficult to approach. Suffice to say it works very well, but don’t let it run too long or you might need a glove to get through the molten rainstorm to shut it off…

The JetBoil does not fit!BurnerDinnerThe Burner AssemblyCooking DinnerBoiling WaterDinner

As I have read in reviews elsewhere, the completed assembly is a bit top heavy, especially with water in the cup. Caution around the stove, and perhaps even one of those stabilizing stands they sell separately would be a good idea. We had no problems on this outing, but I could see this being more difficult at a poorer campsite.

For some reason, when ordering the JetBoils it didn’t occur to me how easy it would be to simply boil a few cups of water and pour the boiling water into single-serving food containers. As a result, we purchased two of the stoves when one stove is quite sufficient for two people. I generally have the food packed this way anyhow so we can grab whatever meal we feel like. Of course, if you’re using individually packaged food you also have this option. If you intend, as I originally did, to finish preparing and serve your food in the JetBoil itself you will probably want one per person (or at least an optional extra cup/pot per person). Our second, unused JetBoil will be for sale shortly… :grin:

The Bad

My only real quarrel with the unit is that a JetBoil stove will not fit “anywhere a 1L Nalgene will” as commonly advertised. Be forewarned: it will not fit in the 5.11 Bottle Carrier, the Maxpedition 10×4 Bottle Holder, the Nalgene pockets of any of the Maxpedition cases and Versipacks or even in the expanding Maxpedition Mini-RolyPoly. Maxpedition does make a 12×5 Bottle pouch it will fit in, however.

The JetBoil does not fit!

SOG Flash II

Rating: 5 / 5

Pros:
Strong, stays sharp under heavy abuse, quick opening, good grip, all-metal

Cons:
After 2 years of carry – none

The Bottom Line:
If you need a good, solid, all-purpose folding knife you can count on for daily carry this is the blade to get. After over two years of abuse opening boxes, slicing cord, shaving wood and cutting .25″ steel cable the blade is still as sharp as the day I got it, the edge has no nicks or chips, and the finish is still in great shape.

My Gerber EVO has been retired since damage to the frame now prevents auto-quick opening. Yes, it was seriously abused (prying) to cause the damage. I still consider Gerber to be the best cheap steel available.

Replacing it is a SOG Flash II (the black/aluminum variant) with “SOG Assisted Technology”, which so far has been a good solid knife and goes with me everywhere. It costs about twice what the Gerber EVO does, but it is as close as you can get to legally carrying an auto-opener in communist states like California. The blade has held an edge nicely for the past 4 months or so on wood, cord and cardboard. The pocket clip is attached from the rear of the knife, allowing the entire knife body to sit out of sight. The clip is reversible to either side, or can be removed altogether. Yes, it has a “safety” to prevent accidental opening while in-pocket. The only thing I don’t like about this knife is the clip, which is way too strong and sometimes difficult to get over some pockets with reinforced hems. On the other hand, there’s little chance of the knife getting lost because it came unclipped.

SOG Flash II showing lock and safetySOG Flash II aluminum pattern detailSOG Flash II reversible pocket clipSOG Flash II showing reversible pocket clipSOG Flash II reversible pocket clipSOG Flash II closedSOG Flash II TiNi part-serrated bladeSOG Flash II with 3.5-inch subdued combo-blade open

5.11 Packable Jacket

Rating: 4 / 5

Pros:
Waterproof, dries quickly, extremely compact and easy to pack, good wind breaker, does not get “sticky”, also available in olive green

Cons:
Does not breathe, so it is HOT in hot, humid weather; no hood

The Bottom Line:
This is a good jacket to have handy in the desert and in cooler climates when it might rain, but when it isn’t cold enough for a jacket just yet. It also does well as an outer water- and wind-proof shell over warmer clothes in cold weather. It’s small size and compressibility make it easy to toss in your bag or even in a cargo pants pocket. I would not recommend this jacket for the tropics or humid climates, even with it’s light weight, as the lack of breatheability makes it very hot in such conditions.

I’ve had one of these tucked away in my go-bag for months now, but haven’t really had a chance to try it out until this past weekend’s thunderstorms. As usual, we decided to head out in the rain and enjoy tourist-free hiking/climbing in Joshua Tree, my lack of a lightweight waterproof jacket no deterrence. As a waterproof outer-shell the Packable Jacket performs excellently, I was completely dry the entire time up top. Well, except for perspiration which is where the jacket falls short. Unfortunately, it is quite unbreathable and gets quite hot inside, quite fast (especially in hot/humid weather). It was comfortable during the cold of the storm, but as soon as it started to clear (and warm up) I opted to open it up and take my chances. I will say this though: despite being hot inside it did not stick to me like I’ve been told so many other similar jackets do.

5.11 Packable Jacket next to a 1L Nalgene 5.11 Packable Jacket in the lightning, in the LIGHTNING, in the rain… 5.11 Packable Jacket, dry underneath

Drying it off is a cinch, even in humid weather, and it was ready to pack up again not 5 minutes after the rain stopped. It packs up quick and easy, and when packed the Packable Jacket will fit nicely in most small bags, a standard BDU cargo pocket or the rear-center pocket of the 5.11 Tactical Vest (no doubt intentionally).

Folding up the 5.11 Packable Jacket 5.11 Packable Jacket in it's own pocket 5.11 Packable Jacket in the cargo pocket of Tru-spec's tactical pant 5.11 Packable Jacket next to a 1L Nalgene

$20 from LAPG

Branding-free Boots?

Rating: 3.5 / 5

Pros:
Cheap, decent quality for the price, reasonably comfortable, fairly light-weight, no logos

Cons:
Cheap, zipper needs cleaning every few months, laces are difficult to tighten, made in China

The Bottom Line:
These aren’t a bad pair of boots to have sitting in your emergency kit, overnight bag left in the trunk of your car, or simply sitting in a box as spares. While they are pretty comfy, they lack the longevity required in an everyday boot, and will start to fall apart in less than a year with such use. The zippers are solid and reliable as long as they are kept clean.

Curved side-zips, BAD! I learned this on my last trip out to Kingman when the zipper on my Thorogood Omega split right open from the middle. Before this, they’ve always seemed to have a bad habit of unzipping during heavy activity since the zipper does not lock down. It’s kind of a bummer too, they were my favorite boots so far, but with this bad a design flaw there’s no way I’ll buy another.

Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots, logo-free! Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boots

Enter the Tru-spec 4050 Side-zip boots, still on sale at LAPG for $30 it was perfect timing to try out some cheapos and cover my boot emergency. These understated, logo-free boots are surprisingly good for the price. The straight zipper is a superior design, keeping the stress of wear evenly spread to prevent failure. They’re hard to scuff, handle very well on slippery wet rocks, and are quite comfortable for moderate hiking or light climbing. So far, I have not needed to change out the insole. The boots stay nice and cool in hot weather, and actually grip so well I found myself stumbling a little when they did not slip as expected. Oh, and these zippers do lock down so they aren’t coming undone on their own!

Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boot in the rain Tru-spec 4050 Zipper Boot keeping me on a steep incline

These boots do lack full waterproofness, though they’ll shrug off a good thunderstorm with no leaks. They can also be a little difficult to lace up in a hurry, as simply grabbing the ends of the laces and pulling is not enough to tighten them. I’ll be putting these in my overnight bag when I pick up my new (waterproof) 5.11 ATACs.

Camelbak Tube Trap™

Camelbak's Tube Trap™

Rating: 5 / 5

Pros:
Simple, durable, effective, cheap

Cons:
They weren’t invented with the first hydration bladder

The Bottom Line:
What took them so long? Finally, drinking tubes no longer have to dangle, swing and strike when hiking, running and climbing.

It would appear I’m not the only one that has been extremely frustrated by the tube of my hydration pack swinging wildly around on hikes and climbs, and the manufacturers have listened (though I may have been ignorant for a while). Enter the Tube Trap™ from Camelbak (yes, Blackhawk has one too), perfectly sized for both insulated and non-insulated tubes, and perfectly sized to attach to both 1″ and .75″ webbing (though it says only .75″). :grin:

Close-up of Camelbak's Tube Trap™

Just $2.00 from LAPG

Maxpedition 10×4 Bottle Holder vs. 5.11 VTAC Bottle Carrier

Maxpedition 10x4 vs. 5.11 VTAC Botttle Carrier

I’ll admit that I am a little biased by 5.11’s SlickStick system, but I’ll set that aside for this review, focus solely on features, and go apples to apples as best I can. Both products have their strong points and weak points, depending on what you’re after.

Maxpedition 10×4 Bottle Holder

Rating: 3 / 5

Pros:
Neat concept, large accessory pocket, versatile attachment/carry options, insulated, single method of access

Cons:
Horrible zipper makes it hard to open, one-handed beverage access impossible

The Bottom Line:
If you want to keep your beverage hot or cold, carry an extra supply of beverage powder or water purification, and can tolerate the zipper-from-hell then this is a great pouch. If they fixed the zipper-related problems I would likely give this a 4.5 / 5 rating. As always, Maxpedition’s super-stiff fabric is both a blessing and a curse.

All of the following should also apply to the wine-bottle sized 12×5 Bottle Holder. This pack is elegant and thoughtful in it’s concept, though barely adequate in execution. Ample Velcro covers the top of the lid for attaching patches, as well as the front panel of the accessory pocket. As with the competition, webbing wraps all 4 sides of this pouch. Yes, I said “sides” – this one attempts to be more rectangular than others, and forces itself to have unnaturally flat sides. While this makes adding even more pockets to the unit a little easier, it can make bottle insertion a little more difficult. The webbing measures 2×2 on the front and 2×3 on either side. The back of the pouch features a snap hook for attachment that will remind you of the Keyper, and either side has D-rings for attaching a shoulder strap. The webbing on the back stops a ways short of the bottom, leaving you at 2×3 rows for attachment that is offset one-half row from the side webbing. I’m not terribly fond of Maxpedition’s choice of “khaki” for their desert color, but I can certainly think of worse and it does its job.

Maxpedition 10x4 Bottle Holder Maxpedition 10x4 Bottle Holder

The inside of this pouch is well insulated and I suspect it would keep a beverage hot/cold for hours. The main pocket has room for the taller narrow-mouth Nalgene and then some (you might even be able to get a cup upside down above the bottle). The accessory pocket up front has ample room for several servings of powder or liquid flavoring, purification tablets, or perhaps even a (very) small filtration unit. This pocket also has an elastic strap at the rear to aid in gear retention, and is easily accessible through its large opening.

Front pocket of the Maxpedition 10x4 Bottle Holder Front pocket of the Maxpedition 10x4 Bottle Holder Ample vertical space in the bottle pocket Maxpedition 10x4 with a 1L Nalgene Narrow-mouth

Here’s where Maxpedition fell short on this pouch: the zipper setup for the bottle pocket sucks. It is extremely difficult to open and close using both hands, and even more difficult to open once attached to a larger pack. It is impossible to open this pocket with one hand. As if that wasn’t enough, the zipper also has a nasty habit of catching on the surrounding nylon. It is so bad I am actually considering replacing this piece with a pocket-free, non-insulated carrier from another manufacturer and forgetting about carrying a cold beverage.

Maxpedition 10x4's problematic zipper Maxpedition 10x4 mated to a BlackHawk Cyclone

5.11 VTAC Nylon Bottle Carrier

Rating: 4.75 / 5

Pros:
Simple, single-purpose, no-nonsense design; light weight; reliable closure; SlickStick™ ROCKS!

Cons:
Velcro and an SRB closure, Velcro makes reseating the lid difficult, no alternate mounting/carry options (a good thing, depending on your needs)

The Bottom Line:
My only complaint with this pouch is the presence of the downright silly Velcro+SRB closure, particularly the Velcro part. With the Velcro, accessing the pouch is both a frustrating and noisy ordeal. Unfortunately, the design of the pouch makes it impossible to remove the Velcro yourself without destroying the lid. Aside from that, this pouch is perfect.

It doesn’t get much simpler than this no-nonsense pouch. One pocket for bottle, no insulation, no accessory pockets, no forced rectangles, and webbing all over. I find I actually prefer the rounded webbing that spans the outside of this pouch, measuring 7×2 in all (with 8 and 9 taken up by SlickStick™). The tall narrow-mouth Nalgene just sits inside with no room to move (good), and the nylon is strong but flexible just like 5.11’s other pouches. I picked up this one to hold a JetBoil setup, and will probably add on a small single-column side pouch to hold kitchen utensils. There are no alternate attachment/carry options for this pouch – perfect for pack attachment and nothing else.

5.11 VTAC Bottle Carrier's webbing 5.11 VTAC Bottle Carrier with a 1L Nalgene Narrow-mouth 5.11 VTAC Bottle Carrier  on a BlackHawk Cyclone

If not for the flaw I mentioned, this pouch would have gotten 5 of 5: Velcro AND SRB is used to access the pocket – very bad idea. First off, Velcro inherently has all manner of noise-related problems I’ve ranted about many many times. In this particular setup, its an extra noisy step to getting at your water/gear with no benefit I’ve been able to find. It doesn’t make the pouch more stable and it doesn’t help secure the contents. While I prefer the SRB alone, I would be happy if they had just gone with either/or.

5.11 VTAC and SlickStick™

I’m just going to do an overview on the VTAC line in general, since pouches are pouches they are generally either well built or not. Get whichever ones fit your gear/need if you go the 5.11 VTAC route (which I do recommend).

SlickStick™ System

5 of 5!

The SlickStick™ system is the best thing to happen to MOLLE/PALS webbing since MOLLE/PALS webbing! I cannot get over how incredibly easy it is using this system to attach pouches to packs and gear, and yes the snaps do hold quite well. The “sticks” themselves seem to be a quad-layer of nylon webbing themselves, and are likely stronger than whatever webbing you are attaching to so there’s no real worry of breakage. They are also quick enough to undo I might even consider using pouches on a less-than-permanent basis.

5.11 VTAC SlickStick™ System 5.11 VTAC SlickStick™ System

5.11 VTAC Pouches

Rating: 4.75 / 5

Pros:
Flexible yet strong, good choice for “Tan” and “Olive” colors, easy access, easy attachment, well planned layouts

Cons:
No available “admin” organizer type pouch

The Bottom Line:
If they make a 5.11 VTAC pouch to fit your gear, BUY!

Excellent :bigok: . I’ll admit I decided to try out these pouches with a FAK in mind because I like the little first-aid logo on the pouch and wanted one for my pack. Fortunately, this impulse-buy did pay off and the VTAC line is now my favorite line of tactical nylon (yes, even ousting Maxpedition). Their pouches are well built, strong yet flexible, and well thought out without an overbearing amount of divisions and mini-pockets to get in the way (not EVERY pouch needs to be an “admin” organizer). I also appreciate their selection and consistency with colors here, well done. The “Coyote Tan” is the true coyote tan, the darker more widely effective color that is also available in their clothing line. I also picked up their equally well built and quite customizable radio pouch to add on the upper-side webbing of my pack. It’s designed for military/corporate radios so it’s a little big for even the larger consumer FRS/GMRS and HAM radios, but the shock cord can easily be re-routed for effective retention. I find it’s just big enough to hold my radio and my hands-free headset.

5.11 VTAC 6x6 First Aid Pouch 5.11 VTAC 6x6 First Aid Pouch 5.11 VTAC 6x6 First Aid Pouch attached to a Blackhawk Cyclone 5.11 VTAC Radio Pouch 5.11 VTAC Radio Pouch 5.11 VTAC Radio Pouch mounted on Blackhawk Cyclone 5.11 Radio Pouch carrying a large Midland GMRS radio

Why didn’t I give this line 5 of 5? They lack a good “admin” organizer pouch in their lineup, so you’ll have to head back to Maxpedition to cover that need. For all other needs, this stuff rocks.