5.11 Packable Jacket

Rating: 4 / 5

Pros:
Waterproof, dries quickly, extremely compact and easy to pack, good wind breaker, does not get “sticky”, also available in olive green

Cons:
Does not breathe, so it is HOT in hot, humid weather; no hood

The Bottom Line:
This is a good jacket to have handy in the desert and in cooler climates when it might rain, but when it isn’t cold enough for a jacket just yet. It also does well as an outer water- and wind-proof shell over warmer clothes in cold weather. It’s small size and compressibility make it easy to toss in your bag or even in a cargo pants pocket. I would not recommend this jacket for the tropics or humid climates, even with it’s light weight, as the lack of breatheability makes it very hot in such conditions.

I’ve had one of these tucked away in my go-bag for months now, but haven’t really had a chance to try it out until this past weekend’s thunderstorms. As usual, we decided to head out in the rain and enjoy tourist-free hiking/climbing in Joshua Tree, my lack of a lightweight waterproof jacket no deterrence. As a waterproof outer-shell the Packable Jacket performs excellently, I was completely dry the entire time up top. Well, except for perspiration which is where the jacket falls short. Unfortunately, it is quite unbreathable and gets quite hot inside, quite fast (especially in hot/humid weather). It was comfortable during the cold of the storm, but as soon as it started to clear (and warm up) I opted to open it up and take my chances. I will say this though: despite being hot inside it did not stick to me like I’ve been told so many other similar jackets do.

5.11 Packable Jacket next to a 1L Nalgene 5.11 Packable Jacket in the lightning, in the LIGHTNING, in the rain… 5.11 Packable Jacket, dry underneath

Drying it off is a cinch, even in humid weather, and it was ready to pack up again not 5 minutes after the rain stopped. It packs up quick and easy, and when packed the Packable Jacket will fit nicely in most small bags, a standard BDU cargo pocket or the rear-center pocket of the 5.11 Tactical Vest (no doubt intentionally).

Folding up the 5.11 Packable Jacket 5.11 Packable Jacket in it's own pocket 5.11 Packable Jacket in the cargo pocket of Tru-spec's tactical pant 5.11 Packable Jacket next to a 1L Nalgene

$20 from LAPG

Pelican 1080 HardBack

Rating: 4.75 / 5

Pros:
Its a Pelican Case. It floats, it is crush proof, it is waterproof, it is dust proof…

Cons:
No shoulder strap (the larger 1090 has one), no black-on-black model

The Bottom Line:
If it matters, it should be transported in a Pelican Case.

Well, there’s really not much else to say… it’s a Pelican. :grin:

Alright, for shits and giggles I did jump on my Pelican 1080 a few times, take it to the beach, bury it in sand, throw it in the ocean, rinse it off by throwing it in a pool, then test how hard it is to make the 10-pound buoyant case sink. I can honestly say now that if it matters, you need a Pelican. I am hooked and have since purchased several more for other sensitive gear. I had to go with charcoal/brushed aluminum since I could not find a black-on-black model anywhere (in fact, I was lucky to get this one). It doesn’t look bad, but it does reflect a lot more than I’d like. So far I have only had two problems with the case. Firstly, there is no shoulder strap option which seems downright silly. I have carried it alone anyhow, but having a shoulder strap would make this case just that much nicer. Second, the aluminum hinges did take on the sound of grinding sand after the beach “test”, though this is not a big deal as a quick blast from canned air took care of the problem in seconds.

Pelican 1080 HardBack Pelican 1080 HardBack with an ASUS 13.3-inch notebook Pelican 1080 HardBack in a Maxpedition Operator

For those of you wondering about sizing, yes it will handle nearly all 13.3 and smaller notebooks, including the larger ASUS models. If like myself you then want to put the little Pelican into another case, it will generally fit well in many notebook cases/bags designed to carry a 15-inch notebook and probably all designed for a 17-inch. My own personal preference is to carry it in a Maxpedition Operator (designed for a 15.4-inch), using the extra length of the larger bag to hold a small scanner.

I picked up the case from Southwest Public Safety for about $70 at the time of this writing, where I’ve purchased every Pelican case since.

The Henry AR-7

AKA the Henry US Survival

I’ve wanted a lightweight .22 I can throw in my pack for multi-day hikes, and when it comes to size, weight and price the AR7 simply can’t be beat. On quality of workmanship and materials I give the Henry version 3 of 5… it seems pretty sturdy, but the finish definitely leaves some to be desired. Mine came from the factory with ample scratches through the black coating, and in a generally dirty condition (metal shavings and all). After taking it apart and cleaning it up it looks a lot nicer but the scratches remain. Still, for $150 new I’m not complaining.

Henry US Survival Assembled

The disassemble/package into stock feature is nice in theory but somewhat lacking in actual execution in my opinion. It doesn’t take long to put it together, but really if you’re out hiking with it you’re not going to get into your bag and get the gun assembled before the squirrel you’re after takes off. It’s also a little tough to get the end-cap off, and practically impossible to do so silently. Of course, the other concern is stowing a scope if you happen to go that route. I’m on the search now for a collapsible stock and pouch I like, and plan to go that route instead (I may even build one). I also don’t like how the front of the magazines are shaped… they tend to slice into the hand a bit being that’s the natural place the weak hand falls. Fortunately, a .22 has little recoil, so you don’t have to grip it too tight.

Parts

The plus side on the Henry unit over other manufacturers, aside from being able to buy it new, is the ability to mount a scope without any modifications or adapters. My understanding is that most other AR7s don’t offer the grooved receiver rib, and it’s mere seconds to get a scope mounted up. I also liked how completely ridiculously simple it is inside. With the amount of room in this thing you could probably pour sand in it and it would still fire. You do have to be a little careful stripping it down because of this as the innards have a tendency to fly apart the moment you pull on anything with the cover off. Still, with a little help from detailed pictures of the rifle’s innards over at The Packing Rat it was very easy to take apart, clean and reassemble with little more than a flathead and a brush. Very little lubrication is needed as there’s not much metal-on-metal motion with all the room on the inside. TPR also had a nice tip on the the bolt handle, something easy to miss at first since no real manual is included with the AR7. No, it isn’t permanently in that impossible-to-pull-back position, it actually slides out so you can use it without hurting your fingers… OMG YAY! :lmao:

Bolt Down Bolt Up

The Bushnell 4×32 .22 Rim-fire Scope

Granted, I have extremely limited experience with proper scopes, but I really like this scope. For a mere $28 this is an extremely well-built unit. It seems rugged, solid and well sealed, and no visible manufacturing distortions are present. The picture is just slightly darker than reality, but it seems alright in low light despite this. The lens protectors also happen to be clear, with one end yellowed, which is a nice touch if you happen to need to use this scope when there’s water or dust spray.

After reading about the pains one can go through getting a scope mounted to the AR7 (I admire his patience), I opted to try for an all-in-one quick-release AR7 scope-mounting solution. With the Bushnell model, the included pre-mounted brackets clamp straight on to the groove in the rifle’s receiver and tighten securely with thumb-screws. They can also be tightened further with a flathead screwdriver, but I’ve opted for just thumb-tightening the unit given the take-down nature of the rifle. While it’s a significantly larger scope than the BSA, the route I’m going for stowage should allow plenty of room. Considering the way the bracket works I’m hopeful the scope wont fade from zero with repeated removal/reinstallation.

Finished (for now)

Final verdict on this one will have to wait until I get a chance to go shooting later this week, but at this point I’m very pleased with my purchases. I do definitely want a collapsing or folding stock of some sort though, and I really dislike AR7 Industries' version. A Mitchell Arms stock would be a welcome addition, but they are near-impossible to find these days and I think I can do better anyhow. Majestic Arms does have a nice setup, but you have to buy the entire gun (no kit available) and I would really rather fold than take down.

Glo-Toob™ Lithium

Rating: 5 / 5

Pros:
Durable, waterproof, crushproof, bright, long battery life

Cons:
A little big for a keychain, price

The backorder on my Glo-Toob™ Lithium finally came in yesterday after a month of waiting. I was initially surprised at just how much bigger the new ‘toob has to be to accommodate the larger 123A battery, this one will no doubt be too big for many people’s keychains. Since I keep little else on my keychain, I find the increased size isn’t a problem.

Glo-Toob Lithium vs. FX on a keychainGlo-Toob Lithium vs. FX on a keychain

In The Box

This lithium version comes with the push-button cap, quick-release neck lanyard and 3500-meter waterproof cap, along with a protective cover for whichever cap is not in use. The waterproof cap is similar in appearance to the standard cap on the FX model, but is designed to prevent the accidental activation the older model often experienced from twisting on it’s attachment point. Instead, the switch is a separate part that spins independently from the base.

Glo-Toob™ LithiumGlo-Toob™ Lithium with waterproof capGlo-Toob™ LithiumGlo-Toob™ Lithium with included accessoriesGlo-Toob™ Lithium push-button cap close-up

Comparison

Well, as I mentioned before it is a little bigger… by about a third. It is also much brighter. In fact, at full power it is so bright that concealed use in some situations might be a problem – though the 25% power-mode is quite reasonable. It also sports 11 different lighting modes, whereas the FX only has 7. The increased lifespan of the 123A battery is a plus, and despite the increased brightness runtime is extended to a total of 30-100 hours. The only real downside on this unit is going to be price. The FX can be picked up for under $20, whereas the Lithium costs upwards of $40.

Glo-Toob™ Lithium vs. Glo-Toob™ FXGlo-Toob™ Lithium vs. Glo-Toob™ FXGlo-Toob™ Lithium vs. Glo-Toob™ FXGlo-Toob™ Lithium vs. Glo-Toob™ FXGlo-Toob™ Lithium vs. Glo-Toob™ FX

Given the increased output and runtime, I’ll probably order one in white to replace the standard Glo-Toob™ I use on my hiking staff.