<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chazz Layne &#187; Americans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chazzlayne.com/tag/americans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com</link>
	<description>Truth &#62; Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Mojave Cross &#8211; Stolen!</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2010/05/the-mojave-cross-stolen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2010/05/the-mojave-cross-stolen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mojave Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mojave Desert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mojave National Preserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mojave Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VFW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=1359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was bad enough that a decade-long legal battle had to be fought to get the old World War I memorial uncovered, but now that the Supreme Court has finally done the right thing the memorial itself has been stolen: VFW article. All that remains now is the broken base and twisted bolts atop the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was bad enough that a decade-long legal battle had to be fought to get the old World War I memorial uncovered, but now that the Supreme Court has finally done the right thing the memorial itself has been stolen: <a href="http://www.vfw.org/index.cfm?fa=news.newsDtl&#038;did=5472" title="VFW &raquo; Mojave Desert Memorial Torn Down!">VFW article</a>. All that remains now is the broken base and twisted bolts atop the boulder&hellip;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.chazzlayne.com/upload/2010/05/photo05_hires.jpg" alt="Mojave Cross Base" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1363" /></p>
<p>Updates, when available, can be found at the <a href="http://www.donttearmedown.com/" title="Don't Tear Me Down">Don&#8217;t Tear Me Down</a> website, along with a donation link if you wish to contribute to the reward they&#8217;ve posted for tracking down the people who did this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2010/05/the-mojave-cross-stolen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protesting Americans?</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2010/05/protesting-americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2010/05/protesting-americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protestors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=1349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arizona has been on a roll lately. Actually, scratch that&#8230; the state seems to have gone quite mad (in a good way). What I can only call &#8220;pro-American&#8221; bills have been flying through the state senate and off the governors desk (with her signature on them) on everything from firearms to healthcare, so many of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arizona has been on a roll lately. Actually, scratch that&#8230; the state seems to have gone quite mad (in a good way). What I can only call &#8220;pro-American&#8221; bills have been flying through the state senate and off the governors desk (with her signature on them) on everything from firearms to healthcare, so many of them that I&#8217;ve lost track.</p>
<p>Only somewhat surprisingly, the media has more or less overlooked even the &#8220;anti-Obama&#8221; bill, and their focus seems stuck on the Arizona Immigration Bill (<a href="http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070p.htm" title="Arizona State Legislature &raquo; SB1070">SB1070</a>). As usual, they are doing their &#8220;un-biased&#8221; best to stir up protests, boycotts, and drama amongst the sheeple over the matter. A friend of mine sent me this picture of some of these fine, hard-working, American citizens out on the streets protesting the bill&hellip;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.chazzlayne.com/upload/2010/05/Illegal-aliens.jpg" alt="Illegal Aliens?" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1351" /></p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not assuming they are illegals, I really don&#8217;t know either way. The lack of responsibility for their own lives portrayed in their message doesn&#8217;t bother me too much. Even the blatant threat of violence against us if we don&#8217;t feed, cloth and shelter them isn&#8217;t all that shocking, we&#8217;ve certainly seen that and much worse from their camp before.</p>
<p><strong>&hellip;but what is that flag they are carrying?</strong></p>
<p>In the past when this sort of protest has broken out they&#8217;ve carried the Mexican flag around called us names, or flown ours upside down underneath theirs while passing out rhetoric about the big bad American oppressors that need to be overthrown. This time they march the streets with the American flag as if to say that they <i>are</i> the Americans here, and those of us who work for a living and pay our own way are somehow being un-American by not wanting to give the whole world a free ride on our dime?</p>
<p>If they feel things have progressed far enough in their favor that it is time for this message, doesn&#8217;t that make it blatantly obvious just how far our society has fallen? If you cannot see this, and the threat it represents, you truly are blind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2010/05/protesting-americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Flag</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/05/american-flag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/05/american-flag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEDGOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadsden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swastika]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Why do I continue to fly the American Flag? Some have questioned this in light of everything going on today. Others have suggested I flip it upside down as a sign of distress, or one of disrespect towards the current administration (which I find amusing as the administration is not the nation). I have even had a few make comments towards it as the "American Swastika." I hold to none of these beliefs.</p>
<p>Perhaps the question that should be asked should be directed the other way. Why have you stopped flying the American Flag? Why would you surrender everything that it means, the Republic for which it stands, and all who have fought and died for it to the hands of those that would seek to destroy it and pervert it's meaning?</p>
<p>For over a century treasonous forces have been at work, tearing at the fabric of our nation to destroy us from within. They may have convinced the masses of a new meaning for the flag, but some of us have not forgotten it's true purpose. You ask me why I continue to fly it&#8230; I continue to fly it because it is my responsibility as a citizen to refuse to let them take that away from me. I refuse to let them do to our symbol of liberty what Hitler did so many years ago to a symbol of peace.</p>
<p>Instead of flipping it over or tearing it down because you've lost all hope, instead of giving up and surrendering to the darkness, why don't you reunite it with an old friend as a show of defiance against these bastards who seek to destroy our nation and our way of life&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.chazzlayne.com/upload/2009/05/gadsden.jpg" alt="The Gadsden Flag" /></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I continue to fly the American Flag? Some have questioned this in light of everything going on today. Others have suggested I flip it upside down as a sign of distress, or one of disrespect towards the current administration (which I find amusing as the administration is not the nation). I have even had a few make comments towards it as the &#8220;American Swastika.&#8221; I hold to none of these beliefs.</p>
<p>Perhaps the question that should be asked should be directed the other way. Why have you stopped flying the American Flag? Why would you surrender everything that it means, the Republic for which it stands, and all who have fought and died for it to the hands of those that would seek to destroy it and pervert it&#8217;s meaning?</p>
<p>For over a century treasonous forces have been at work, tearing at the fabric of our nation to destroy us from within. They may have convinced the masses of a new meaning for the flag, but some of us have not forgotten it&#8217;s true purpose. You ask me why I continue to fly it&hellip; I continue to fly it because it is my responsibility as a citizen to refuse to let them take that away from me. I refuse to let them do to our symbol of liberty what Hitler did so many years ago to a symbol of peace.</p>
<p>Instead of flipping it over or tearing it down because you&#8217;ve lost all hope, instead of giving up and surrendering to the darkness, why don&#8217;t you reunite it with an old friend as a show of defiance against these bastards who seek to destroy our nation and our way of life&hellip;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.chazzlayne.com/upload/2009/05/gadsden.jpg" alt="The Gadsden Flag" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/05/american-flag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Definitions</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/05/definitions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/05/definitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extremism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extremist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extremists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEDGOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope & change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Our tax dollars continue to work wonders at the hands of Pat (Janet Napolitano) and the Department of Homeland Security. Here's a partial list of definitions taken from their "home-grown terrorist" handbook. Some of these are rather amusing, such as "antitechnologyextremism" (I had no idea that even existed). However most are quite disturbing, particularly the "symptoms" displayed by such groups or individuals. I've highlighted the real gems&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>aboveground: <i>A term used to describe extremist groups or individuals who operate overtly and portray themselves as law-abiding.</i></p>
<p>alternative media: <i>A term used to describe various <strong>information sources that provide a forum for interpretations of events and issues that differ radically from those presented in mass media products and outlets.</i></strong></p>
<p>anarchist extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who advocate a society devoid of government structure or ownership of individual property. Many embrace some of the radical philosophical components of anticapitalist, antiglobalization, communist, socialist, and other movements. Anarchist extremists advocate changing government and society through revolutionary violence. (also: revolutionary anarchists)</i></p>
<p>animal rights extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who ascribe equal value to all living organisms and seek to end the perceived abuse and suffering of animals. They believe animals are sentient creatures that experience emotional, physical, and mental awareness and deserve many of the same rights as human beings; for example, the right to life and freedom to engage in normal, instinctive animal behavior. These groups have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals. They have targeted industries, businesses, and government entities that they perceive abuse or exploit animals, including those that use animals for testing, human services, food production, or consumption. (also: animal liberation)</i></p>
<p>antiabortion extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who are virulently antiabortion and advocate violence against providers of abortion-related services, their employees, and their facilities. Some cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities.</i></p>
<p>anti-immigration extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who are vehemently opposed to illegal immigration, particularly along the U.S. southwest border with Mexico, and who have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism to advance their extremist goals. <strong>They are highly critical of the U.S. Government’s response to illegal immigration and oppose government programs that are designed to extend “rights” to illegal aliens, such as issuing driver’s licenses or national identification cards and providing in-state tuition, medical benefits, or public education&#8230;</strong></i></p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our tax dollars continue to work wonders at the hands of Pat (Janet Napolitano) and the Department of Homeland Security. Here&#8217;s a partial list of definitions taken from their &#8220;home-grown terrorist&#8221; handbook. Some of these are rather amusing, such as &#8220;antitechnologyextremism&#8221; (I had no idea that even existed). However most are quite disturbing, particularly the &#8220;symptoms&#8221; displayed by such groups or individuals. I&#8217;ve highlighted the real gems&hellip;</p>
<blockquote><p>aboveground: <i>A term used to describe extremist groups or individuals who operate overtly and portray themselves as law-abiding.</i></p>
<p>alternative media: <i>A term used to describe various <strong>information sources that provide a forum for interpretations of events and issues that differ radically from those presented in mass media products and outlets.</i></strong></p>
<p>anarchist extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who advocate a society devoid of government structure or ownership of individual property. Many embrace some of the radical philosophical components of anticapitalist, antiglobalization, communist, socialist, and other movements. Anarchist extremists advocate changing government and society through revolutionary violence. (also: revolutionary anarchists)</i></p>
<p>animal rights extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who ascribe equal value to all living organisms and seek to end the perceived abuse and suffering of animals. They believe animals are sentient creatures that experience emotional, physical, and mental awareness and deserve many of the same rights as human beings; for example, the right to life and freedom to engage in normal, instinctive animal behavior. These groups have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals. They have targeted industries, businesses, and government entities that they perceive abuse or exploit animals, including those that use animals for testing, human services, food production, or consumption. (also: animal liberation)</i></p>
<p>antiabortion extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who are virulently antiabortion and advocate violence against providers of abortion-related services, their employees, and their facilities. Some cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities.</i></p>
<p>anti-immigration extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who are vehemently opposed to illegal immigration, particularly along the U.S. southwest border with Mexico, and who have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism to advance their extremist goals. <strong>They are highly critical of the U.S. Government’s response to illegal immigration and oppose government programs that are designed to extend “rights” to illegal aliens, such as issuing driver’s licenses or national identification cards and providing in-state tuition, medical benefits, or public education.</strong></i></p>
<p>antitechnologymextremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals opposed to technology. These groups have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals. They have targeted college and university laboratories, scholars, biotechnology industries, U.S. corporations involved in the computer or airline industry, and others. (also: Neo-Luddites)</i></p>
<p>Aryan prison gangs: <i>Individuals who form organized groups while in prison and advocate white supremacist views. Group members may continue to operate under the auspices of the prison gang upon their release from correctional facilities.</i></p>
<p>black bloc: <i>An organized collection of violent anarchists and anarchist affinity groups that band together for illegal acts of civil disturbance and use tactics that destroy property or strain law enforcement resources. <strong>Black blocs operate in autonomous cells that infiltrate nonviolent protests, often without the knowledge of the organizers of the event.</strong></i> <span style="color: #06F;">(CL: like ACORN?)</span></p>
<p>black nationalism: <i>A term used by black separatists to promote the unification and separate identity of persons of black or African American descent and who advocate the establishment of a separate nation within the United States.</i></p>
<p>black power: <i>A term used by black separatists to describe their pride in and the perceived superiority of the black race.</i></p>
<p>black separatism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals of black or African American descent who advocate the separation of the races or the separation of specific geographic regions from the rest of the United States; some advocate forming their own political system within a separate nation. Such groups or individuals also may embrace radical religious beliefs. Members have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence directed toward local law enforcement in an attempt to advance their extremist goals.</i></p>
<p>Christian Identity: <i>A racist religious philosophy that maintains non-Jewish whites are “God’s Chosen People” and the true descendants of the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Groups or individuals can be followers of either the Covenant or Dual Seedline doctrine; all believe that Jews are conspiring with Satan to control world affairs and that the world is on the verge of the Biblical apocalypse. Dual Seedline adherents believe Jews are the literal offspring of Satan and that nonwhites, who are often referred to as “mud people,” are not human beings. (also: Identity, CI, Anglo-Israel)</i></p>
<p>Cuban independence extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who do not recognize the legitimacy of the Communist Cuban Government and who attempt to subvert it through acts of violence, mainly within the United States. (also: anti-Castro groups)</i></p>
<p>decentralized terrorist movement: <i><strong>A movement of groups or individuals who pursue shared ideological goals through tactics of leaderless resistance independent of any larger terrorist organization.</strong></i> <span style="color: #06F;">(CL: Think about just how broad this definition really is, doesn&#8217;t it describe most Americans?)</span></p>
<p>denial-of-service attack: <i>An attack that attempts to prevent or impair the intended functionality of computer networks, systems, or applications. Depending on the type of system targeted, the attack can employ a variety of mechanisms and means. (also: DoS attack)</i></p>
<p>direct action: <i>Lawful or unlawful acts of civil disobedience ranging from protests to property destruction or acts of violence. This term is most often used by single-issue or anarchist extremists to describe their activities.</i></p>
<p>environmental extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who use violence to end what they perceive as the degradation of the natural environment by humans. Members have advocated or engaged in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals. They target industries, businesses, and government entities that they allege are engaged in habitat destruction, citing urban sprawl and development, logging, construction sites and related equipment, and man-made sources of air, water, and land pollution. (also: ecoterrorism)</i></p>
<p>ethnic-based extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who are drawn together and form extremist beliefs based on their ethnic or cultural background. Members have advocated or engaged in criminal activity and have plotted acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals.</i></p>
<p>extremist group: <i>An ideologically driven organization that advocates or attempts to bring about political, religious, economic, or social change through the use of force, violence, or ideologically motivated criminal activity.</i></p>
<p>green anarchism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who combine anarchist ideology with an environmental focus. They advocate a return to a preindustrial, agrarian society, often through acts of violence and terrorism.</i></p>
<p>hacktivism: <i>(A portmanteau of “hacking” and “activism.”) <strong>The use of cyber technologies to achieve a political end, or technology-enabled political or social activism.</strong> Hacktivism might include website defacements, denial-of-service attacks, hacking into the target’s network to introduce malicious software (malware), or <strong>information theft</strong>.</i> <span style="color: #06F;">(CL: Including things like taking this list of flawed definitions from DHS so all the world can see?)</span></p>
<p>hate groups: <i>A term most often used to describe white supremacist groups. It is occasionally used to describe other racist extremist groups.</i></p>
<p>Jewish extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals of the Jewish faith who are willing to use violence or commit other criminal acts to protect themselves against perceived affronts to their religious or ethnic identity.</i></p>
<p>leaderless resistance: <i>A strategy that stresses the importance of individuals and small cells acting independently and anonymously outside formalized organizational structures to enhance operational security and avoid detection. It is used by many types of domestic extremists.</i></p>
<p>leftwing extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals that embraces anticapitalist, Communist, or Socialist doctrines and seeks to bring about change through violent revolution rather than through established political processes. The term also refers to leftwing, single-issue extremist movements that are dedicated to causes such as environmentalism, opposition to war, and the rights of animals. (also: far left, extreme left)</i></p>
<p>lone terrorist: <i>An individual motivated by extremist ideology to commit acts of criminal violence independent of any larger terrorist organization. (also: lone wolf)</i></p>
<p>Mexican separatism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals of Mexican descent who advocate the secession of southwestern U.S. states (all or part of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas) to join with Mexico through armed struggle. Members do not recognize the legitimacy of these U.S. states, including the U.S. Government’s original acquisition of these territories.</i></p>
<p><strong>militia movement: <i>A rightwing extremist movement composed of groups or individuals who adhere to an antigovernment ideology often incorporating various conspiracy theories. Members oppose most federal and state laws, regulations, and authority (particularly firearms laws and regulations) and often conduct paramilitary training designed to resist perceived government interference in their activities or to overthrow the U.S. Government through the use of violence. (also: citizens militia, unorganized militia)</i></strong> <span style="color: #06F;">(CL: WOW how the definition of &#8220;militia&#8221; has changed&hellip;)</span></p>
<p>neo-Nazis: <i>Groups or individuals who adhere to and promote Adolph Hitler’s beliefs and use Nazi symbols and ideology. Subjects subscribe to virulently racist as well as anti-Semitic beliefs, many based on national socialist ideals derived from Nazi Germany. Neo-Nazis may attempt to downplay or deny the Jewish Holocaust. (also: national socialists, Nazis)</i></p>
<p><strong>patriot movement: <i>A term used by rightwing extremists to link their beliefs to those commonly associated with the American Revolution. The patriot movement primarily comprises violent antigovernment groups such as militias and sovereign citizens. (also: Christian patriots, patriot group, Constitutionalists, Constitutionist)</i></strong> <span style="color: #06F;">(CL: I don&#8217;t know what to do but laugh at this one)</span></p>
<p>Phineas Priesthood: <i>A Christian Identity doctrine derived from the Biblical story of Phinehas, which adherents interpret as justifying inter-racial killing. Followers of this belief system also have advocated martyrdom and violence against homosexuals, mixed-race couples, and abortion providers.</i></p>
<p>primary targeting: <i>Plans or attacks directed by extremists against parties that are the focus of an organized campaign.</i></p>
<p>Puerto Rican independence extremists: <i>Groups or individuals who engage in criminal activity and advocate the use of violence to achieve Puerto Rican independence from the United States.</i></p>
<p>racial Nordic mysticism: <i>An ideology adopted by many white supremacist prison gangs who embrace a Norse mythological religion, such as Odinism or Asatru. (also: Odinism, Asatru)</i></p>
<p>racialist: <i>A term used by white supremacists intended to minimize their extreme views on racial issues.</i></p>
<p>racist skinheads: <i>Groups or individuals who combine white supremacist ideology with a skinhead ethos in which “white power” music plays a central role. Dress may include a shaved head or very short hair, jeans, thin suspenders, combat boots or Doc Martens, a bomber jacket (sometimes with racist symbols), and tattoos of Nazi-like emblems. Some are abandoning these stereotypical identifiers. (also: skins)</i></p>
<p>radicalization: <i>The process by which an individual adopts an extremist belief system leading to his or her willingness to advocate or bring about political, religious, economic, or social change through the use of force, violence, or ideologically motivated criminal activity.</i></p>
<p><strong>rightwing extremism: <i>A movement of rightwing groups or individuals who can be broadly divided into those who are primarily hate-oriented, and those who are mainly antigovernment and reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. This term also may refer to rightwing extremist movements that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration. (also known as far right, extreme right)</i></strong> <span style="color: #06F;">(CL: So anyone that continues to respect the Constitution of these United States &ndash; including the entire military and many government employees)</span></p>
<p>secondary targeting: <i>Plans or attacks directed against parties (secondary targets) that provide direct financial, logistic, or physical support to the primary target of an organized campaign, with the goal of coercing those parties to end their engagement with a primary target. Secondary targets can include customers of or suppliers to a primary target or employees of a primary target organization.</i></p>
<p>single-issue extremist groups: <i>Groups or individuals who focus on a single issue or cause—such as animal rights, environmental or anti-abortion extremism—and often employ criminal acts. Group members may be associated with more than one issue. (also: special interest extremists)</i></p>
<p>skinheads: <i>A subculture composed primarily of working-class, white youth who embrace shaved heads for males, substance abuse, and violence. Skinheads can be categorized as racist, anti-racist or “traditional,” which emphasizes group unity based on fashion, music, and lifestyle rather than political ideology. Dress often includes a shaved head or very short hair, jeans, thin suspenders, combat boots or Doc Martens, and a bomber jacket. (also: skins)</i></p>
<p>sovereign citizen movement: <i>A rightwing extremist movement composed of groups or individuals who reject the notion of U.S. citizenship. They claim to follow only what they believe to be God’s law or common law and the original 10 amendments (Bill of Rights) to the U.S. Constitution. They believe they are emancipated from all other responsibilities associated with being a U.S. citizen, such as paying taxes, possessing a driver’s license and motor vehicle registration, or holding a social security number. They generally do not recognize federal or state government authority or laws. Several sovereign citizen groups in the United States produce fraudulent documents for their members in lieu of legitimate government-issued forms of identification. Members have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals. They often target government officials and law enforcement. (also: state citizens, freemen, preamble citizens, common law citizens)</i></p>
<p><strong>tax resistance movement: <i>Groups or individuals who vehemently believe taxes violate their constitutional rights. Among their beliefs are that wages are not income, that paying income taxes is voluntary, and that the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which allowed Congress to levy taxes on income, was not properly ratified. Members have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals. They often target government entities such as the Internal Revenue Service and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. (also: tax protest movement, tax freedom movement, antitax movement)</i></strong></p>
<p>tertiary targeting: <i>Plans or attacks against parties with indirect links to the primary target of an organized campaign. Tertiary targets can include employees, customers, investors, and other participants in a company (the secondary target) that does business with or provides support services to the primary target; or parties who provide direct financial, logistic, or physical support to the secondary target.</i></p>
<p>underground: <i>A term used to describe clandestine extremist groups, individuals, or their activities.</i></p>
<p>violent antiwar extremism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to voice their opposition to U.S. involvement in war-related activities. They often target the military, seats of government power, and defense industry personnel, facilities, and activities.</i></p>
<p><strong>violent religious sects: <i>Religious extremist groups predisposed toward violence. These groups often stockpile weapons, conduct paramilitary training, and share a paranoid interpretation of current world events, which they often associate with the end of the world. They perceive outsiders as enemies or evil influences; display intense xenophobia and strong distrust of the government; and exercise extreme physical or psychological control over group members, sometimes isolating them from society or subjecting them to physical or sexual abuse and harsh initiation practices.</i></strong> <span style="color: #06F;">(CL: Sounds like Islam according to the Koran)</span></p>
<p>white nationalism: <i>A term used by white supremacists to emphasize what they perceive as the uniquely white (European) heritage of the United States.</i></p>
<p>white power: <i>A term used by white supremacists to describe their pride in and the perceived superiority of the white race.</i></p>
<p>white separatism: <i>A movement of groups or individuals who believe in the separation of races and reject interracial marriages. Some advocate the secession of specific geographic regions from the rest of the United States. Members have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals.</i></p>
<p>white supremacist movement: <i>Groups or individuals who believe that whites/Caucasians are intellectually and morally superior to other races and use their racist ideology to justify committing crimes, acts of violence, and terrorism to advance their cause. Some advocate racial separation/segregation. White supremacists generally fall into six categories: Neo-Nazi, Ku Klux KlanUSPER, Christian Identity, racist skinhead, Nordic mysticism, or Aryan prison gangs. White supremacists have been known to embrace more than one of these categories.</i></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see the next chunk of information leaked from DHS. Hopefully it will contain what they plan to DO about all of these &#8220;threats&#8221;&hellip; <img src='http://www.chazzlayne.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/lmao.gif' alt=':lmao:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/05/definitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget AWB, We&#8217;re Headed for an All-Firearms Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/firearms-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/firearms-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault Weapons Ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEDGOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearm Ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope & change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. &#8211; <i>U.S. Constitution, Article VI</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Just when it seemed things were starting to look up in the battle between the individual State's Constitutional rights and unchecked FEDGOD expansion, there is a new plan in the works. Congress may be a part of that great bloated machine, and it has certainly made it's contribution towards further violations of the afore-mentioned sacred document, but it turns out they just aren't moving fast enough for the guys upstairs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/16/AR2009041602694.html" title="The Washington Post &#187; For Obama, Calderón, a Meeting of Minds">President Obama is visiting Mexico today</a>, during which he is continuing his push for the U.S. to ratify the Clinton-era <a href="http://www.oas.org/juridico/English/treaties/a-63.html" title="OAS.org &#187; Inter-American Convention against the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials">Inter-American Arms Treaty</a>, a treaty which is essentially a way of getting around the already pathetically weakened checks &#038; balances of our government to establish new controls over our citizens right to arms &#8211; <strong>without</strong> any sort of oversight. Of course, Mr. Obama prefers you think otherwise&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&hellip;This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. &ndash; <i>U.S. Constitution, Article VI</i></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just when it seemed things were starting to look up in the battle between the individual State&#8217;s Constitutional rights and unchecked FEDGOD expansion, there is a new plan in the works. Congress may be a part of that great bloated machine, and it has certainly made it&#8217;s contribution towards further violations of the afore-mentioned sacred document, but it turns out they just aren&#8217;t moving fast enough for the guys upstairs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/16/AR2009041602694.html" title="The Washington Post &raquo; For Obama, Calderón, a Meeting of Minds">President Obama is visiting Mexico today</a>, during which he is continuing his push for the U.S. to ratify the Clinton-era <a href="http://www.oas.org/juridico/English/treaties/a-63.html" title="OAS.org &raquo; Inter-American Convention against the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials">Inter-American Arms Treaty</a>, a treaty which is essentially a way of getting around what is left of the checks &#038; balances of our government to establish new controls over our citizens right to keep and bear &ndash; <strong>without</strong> any sort of oversight. Of course, Mr. Obama prefers you think otherwise&hellip;</p>
<blockquote><p>But Obama indicated that <strong>while he favors reinstating the U.S. ban on assault weapons, which Congress allowed to expire five years ago, the move would face too much political opposition to happen soon.</strong> He said better enforcing existing laws and increasing U.S. vigilance on the border to prevent arms smuggling, as his administration has begun to do, would have a more immediate effect on stopping U.S.-made weapons from reaching Mexico&#8217;s cartels.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s right. Mr. Obama is being patient because he knows America isn&#8217;t ready for AWB 2, or is he?</p>
<p><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/30242677#30242677" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<blockquote><p>&hellip;we can&#8217;t wait for whatever happens in the congress on something as clearly controversial as an assault weapons ban reinstatement&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p>The truth comes out, I expect to see the blatant misuse of emergency executive powers in the near future. It isn&#8217;t clear if this was an accidental slip by our new DHS head, <i>Its Pat</i>, or if they are simply arrogant enough to think it doesn&#8217;t matter anymore. The fact remains, this treaty is far worse than any version of the Assault Weapons Ban ever has been.</p>
<blockquote><p>The treaty also calls for countries to <strong>adopt strict licensing requirements, mark firearms when they are made and imported to make them easier to trace, and establish a cooperative process for sharing information between national law enforcement agencies</strong> investigating arms smuggling.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So basically without FEDGOD permission (a new federal firearms license) you would not be able to purchase or manufacture firearms. While bad, we knew that was coming soon. What the report doesn&#8217;t say is that the treaty would actually require a license for any of the following activities: purchasing or manufacturing firearms, purchasing or manufacturing (including reloading) ammunition, and purchasing or manufacturing firearm related materials (including any and all accessories).</p>
<p>Digging a little deeper into the treaty&#8217;s text we find the definitions are even more frightening. A firearm is defined as &#8220;any barreled weapon which will or is designed to or may be readily converted to expel a bullet or projectile by the action of an explosive&#8230;or any other weapon or destructive device.&#8221; Ammunition is considered to be &#8220;the complete round or its components, including cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets, or projectiles that are used in any firearm.&#8221; And yes, you read right, &#8220;other related materials&#8221; is defined as any component, part, or replacement part of a firearm <strong>or accessory which can be attached to a firearm!</strong></p>
<p>It will be interesting to see who qualifies for this new federal firearms license, or should I say licenses (one for firearms, one for ammo, one for reloading, one for parts/accessories&hellip;). It also kind of makes you wonder about the shortages created by panic-buying of guns and ammo at a time when gun control laws, at a glance, seem to be loosening. The tinfoil hat says the timing was all part of the plan&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/firearms-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEDGOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope & change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, while the "rightwing extremists" are peacefully protesting at Tea Parties today, what is the far left up to?</p>
<blockquote><p>As you may know a bunch of redneck traitors are planning a protest on April 15th involving waving around a few tea bags and demonstrating mild irritation at Prez. Obama for making them pay taxes. Here is your chance to do your duty for your president and country and send these fools an unmistakable message.</p>
<p>First of all you can sign up at Huffington Post to become a tea party reporter. It would be a good idea to meet some people to take names and also pictures if possible which should also be forwarded to Janet Napolitano at the DHS.</p>
<p>Next you can join with our comrades at ACORN who have plans afoot to disperse these traitors.</p>
<p>Basically the plan works like this - ACORN has infiltrated the redneck groups that are planning all this. On the 15th at the proper moment a van pulls up with 5 young black women with pro Obama signs. They will be peaceful and respectful. Our infiltrators will verbally attack them with profanity and racial slurs and physically push them around while our camera crew films. In a minute they take off and it is all over.</p>
<p>Doesn't seem like much till that night when the video gets put on the news and all you see are crazy hillbilly conservatives attacking innocent black counter protesters, shouting racial slurs and pushing them around.</p>
<p>You too can be a part of the glorious moment in history and help keep these traitors in check.</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, while the &#8220;rightwing extremists&#8221; are peacefully protesting at Tea Parties today what is the far left up to?</p>
<blockquote><p>As you may know a bunch of redneck traitors are planning a protest on April 15th involving waving around a few tea bags and demonstrating mild irritation at Prez. Obama for making them pay taxes. Here is your chance to do your duty for your president and country and send these fools an unmistakable message.</p>
<p>First of all you can sign up at Huffington Post to become a tea party reporter. It would be a good idea to meet some people to take names and also pictures if possible which should also be forwarded to Janet Napolitano at the DHS.</p>
<p>Next you can join with our comrades at ACORN who have plans afoot to disperse these traitors.</p>
<p>Basically the plan works like this &#8211; ACORN has infiltrated the redneck groups that are planning all this. On the 15th at the proper moment a van pulls up with 5 young black women with pro Obama signs. They will be peaceful and respectful. Our infiltrators will verbally attack them with profanity and racial slurs and physically push them around while our camera crew films. In a minute they take off and it is all over.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t seem like much till that night when the video gets put on the news and all you see are crazy hillbilly conservatives attacking innocent black counter protesters, shouting racial slurs and pushing them around.</p>
<p>You too can be a part of the glorious moment in history and help keep these traitors in check.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Radicals&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/radicals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/radicals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEDGOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope & change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A footnote attached to the report by the Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines "rightwing extremism in the United States" as including not just racist or hate groups, <strong>but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>You mean, like groups that believe in upholding the Constitution of these United States, and feel the criminals in Washington should be brought up on charges of treason?</p>
<p>The above was quoted from <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/14/federal-agency-warns-of-radicals-on-right/" title="The Washington Times &#187; ">a story published today on The Washington Times site</a>, where a report by the Department of Homeland Security is essentially lumping anyone who disagrees with the federal government's blatant violations of Constitutional law&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A footnote attached to the report by the Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines &#8220;rightwing extremism in the United States&#8221; as including not just racist or hate groups, <strong>but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>You mean, like groups that believe in upholding the Constitution of these United States, and feel the criminals in Washington should be brought up on charges of treason?</p>
<p>The above was quoted from <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/14/federal-agency-warns-of-radicals-on-right/" title="The Washington Times &raquo; ">a story published today on The Washington Times site</a>, where a report by the Department of Homeland Security is essentially lumping anyone who disagrees with the federal government&#8217;s blatant violations of Constitutional law lately in with the likes of the Ku Klux Klan and other hate groups.</p>
<p>As if the report and it&#8217;s content weren&#8217;t bad enough, the article later attempts to conceal the facts by focusing the attention to hate groups as a whole (specifically &#8220;white-power&#8221; groups) while completely ignoring the fact that DHS is lumping true patriots in with them. They justify this by basically stating that &#8220;if the returning veterans of our military who were defending the constitution (in Iraq?), think it is bad, it must be bad.&#8221; The article then continues to ignore the real problem here and instead makes this an issue of &#8220;veterans joining white-supremacist groups.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We have to remember that the people serving in our military are volunteers, they do it because they love their country, and they believe in what our country stands for,&#8221; he said. &#8220;They spent their time in the military defending our Constitution, so the vast majority of them would be repulsed by the hate groups discussed in this report.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Homeland Security report cited a 2008 FBI report that noted that a small number of returning military veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have joined extremist groups.</p>
<p>The FBI report said that from October 2001 through May 2008 &#8220;a minuscule&#8221; number of veterans, 203 out of 23,000, had joined groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, the National Socialist Movement, the Creativity Movement, the National Alliance and some skinhead groups.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I submit then that a disturbing number of American &#8220;citizens&#8221; have never read our Constitution, and that <a href="http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/html/HC00050I.htm" title="Texas Legislature Online &raquo; 81R HCR-50">the entire state of Texas must be one giant hate group</a> (along with several other states). <img src='http://www.chazzlayne.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/lmao.gif' alt=':lmao:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Update: The <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/14/confirme-the-obama-dhs-hit-job-on-conservatives-is-real/" title="Michelle Malkin &raquo; Confirmed: The Obama DHS hit job on conservatives is real">full DHS report can be viewed here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/04/radicals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still think Obama isn&#8217;t after your guns?</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/02/still-think-obama-isnt-after-your-guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/02/still-think-obama-isnt-after-your-guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope & change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>They have an entire sub-forum dedicated to it at the grass-roots <a href="http://www.theobamaforum.com" title="The Obama Forum">The Obama Forum</a>. Freedom of thought, religion, speech, press, privacy and many others are considered "evil" that must be "purged" from American soil. With open-minded and loving posts like "Homeless people are disgusting and have no right to self-defense", "Music that must be banned!!", "List enemy license plates here", and "Would you kill for Obama?" it is no wonder hate groups like the NRA and the Christian church are their targets&#8230;</p>
<p>If you are still in the dark, or still believe that Obama supporters are, for the most part, just naive youth following the next shiny object I suggest you stop by this "Forum for Supporters of Obama." At the very least check out who their sponsors are, what sub-forums they have, and what they are all about &#8211; that should be enough to wake anyone up&#8230;</p>
<p>"Most users ever online was 4,790, Today at 02:54 AM."</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.chazzlayne.com/upload/2009/02/tof.png" alt="The Obama Forum" class="wp-image-788" /></p>
<p>They have an entire sub-forum dedicated to it at the grass-roots <a href="http://www.theobamaforum.com" title="The Obama Forum">The Obama Forum</a>, and they aren&#8217;t planning to stop there. Freedom of thought, religion, speech, press, privacy and many others are considered &#8220;evil&#8221; that must be &#8220;purged&#8221; from American soil. With open-minded and loving posts like &#8220;Homeless people are disgusting and have no right to self-defense&#8221;, &#8220;Music that must be banned!!&#8221;, &#8220;List enemy license plates here&#8221;, and &#8220;Would you kill for Obama?&#8221; it is no wonder hate groups like the NRA and the Christian church are their targets&hellip;</p>
<p>If you are still in the dark, or still believe that Obama supporters are, for the most part, just naive youth following the next shiny object I suggest you stop by this &#8220;Forum for Supporters of Obama.&#8221; At the very least check out who their sponsors are, what sub-forums they have, and what they are all about &ndash; that should be enough to wake anyone up&hellip;</p>
<p>&#8220;Most users ever online was 4,790, Today at 02:54 AM.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/02/still-think-obama-isnt-after-your-guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unanimous</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/02/unanimous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/02/unanimous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope & change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A friend sent this memo to me the other day. I find this guy's ignorance and incompetence amusing, but not enough to keep me going to Circle-K&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>First off, Mr. Bouchard, Mr. Obama was not voted in unanimously or even close to it! Second, frog or not the people of the <strong>world</strong> do NOT elect our president, the people of <strong>our</strong> nation do. He is also not president of the world (thank God).</p>
<p>As to the "hopes and dreams" nonsense, from what I've witnessed America is now a laughing stock world-wide, not a "message of hope and change" lingering over humanity. The London Daily Mail said it best &#8211; "Victory for Style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-rousing over reality."</p>
<p>I will give you credit for one thing though. In your 4th paragraph you properly used the plural verb "have" after "United States of America". Not many people do that anymore, as most seem to have forgotten that the USA is an alliance of <strong>states</strong> not a collection of provinces. Still, I have my doubts that this is why you worded it this way.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend sent this memo to me the other day. I find this guy&#8217;s ignorance and incompetence amusing, but not enough to keep me going to Circle-K&hellip;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.chazzlayne.com/upload/2009/02/k-note.jpg" alt="k-note" title="k-note" width="873" height="1317" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-784" /></p>
<p>First off, Mr. Bouch<i>tard</i>, Mr. Obama was not voted in unanimously or even close to it! There are many of us who voted against this socialist. Second, the people of the <strong>world</strong> do NOT elect our president, the people of <strong>our</strong> nation do. He is also not president of the world (thank God).</p>
<p>As to the &#8220;hopes and dreams&#8221; nonsense, from what I&#8217;ve witnessed America is now a laughing stock world-wide, not a &#8220;message of hope and change&#8221; lingering over humanity. The London Daily Mail said it best &ndash; &#8220;Victory for Style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-rousing over reality.&#8221;</p>
<p>I will give you credit for one thing though. In your 4th paragraph you properly used the plural verb &#8220;have&#8221; after &#8220;United States of America&#8221;. Not many people do that anymore, as most seem to have forgotten that the USA is an alliance of <strong>states</strong> not a collection of provinces. Still, I have my doubts that this is why you worded it this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/02/unanimous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O HAI KARL</title>
		<link>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/01/o-hai-karl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/01/o-hai-karl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chazz Layne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signs of the Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEDGOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope & change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheeple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chazzlayne.com/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ndash; Karl Marx, Das Kapital, 1867</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chazzlayne.com/2009/01/o-hai-karl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
